Thanks for taking a moment to share your thoughts β it genuinely helps us make each chapter sharper.
What happens next:
Appreciate you helping make this program better for everyone.
Ready for your next challenge? π
Note: this reading is fairly technical in nature and it will make more sense when you do the project. Itβs OK if you donβt understand the words in it right now.
The recommended structure for Apple Search Ads is quite different from all other channels. We got our strategy from an Apple rep, so itβs best to follow it.
With AdWords, you usually target broad match modifiers, with an occasional exact match if a term is really important and frequent. For example, if youβre targeting people who bet on the soccer world cup, you might target the broad term β+sports +bettingβ with an exact match of βworld cup sportsbookβ.
On AdWords, you also do keyword research with the Keyword Planner, AdWords itself, and SEMrush.
But with Apple, you focus on exact keywords, and only use a broad match campaign to do keyword mining for you.
Basically it ends up looking like the chart below:

You have four campaigns:
All keywords that contain the name of the business and/or product. They can be just the business name, like βserviceβ or a combination of the business name and what it does βservice flight delaysβ
All keywords that include competitorβs names
This contains all keywords that arenβt Brand or Competitor related.
A campaign designed to discover new keywords (your broad matches).
The non-Discovery campaigns (Brand, Competitor, and Generic) contain nothing but exact match keywords and do not have Search Match enabled (more on this later).
Apple Search Ads supposedly work best with exact match. You get more impressions and clicks, and more control. So we opt to have everything we can as an exact match keyword.
But the Discovery campaign is whatβs working to mine for new keywords to target in our other campaigns. More on how it does this below.
Although Apple suggests just using one ad group for the 3 non-Discovery campaigns, and two for Discovery, we will apply the structure that we normally follow for AdWords where each ad group is a distinct grouping of relative keywords.
Examples:
Although itβs unclear if this improves the Apple equivalent of AdWordsβ Quality Score (the internal metric used to determine the legitimacy and quality of your ad) and thus lowering CPCs and increasing impressions, itβs possible.
It also makes the campaigns much better organized and easily parsed. Itβll make optimization easier as well.
If youβve opted to create a Creative Set for a particular ad group, make sure to configure it as you create the ad group, otherwise you can leave it blank.
How to source keyword ideas:
As mentioned before, the Discovery campaign is what is doing the keyword research for you. Its sole purpose is to find new keywords to add as exact match to the other campaigns.
You achieve this with two ad groups, Broad Match and Search Match.
One ad group called Broad Match will include every keyword we have in the other 3 campaigns, just as broad match instead of exact match. Create the other campaigns and simply port them all over to this ad group as broad match keywords
The other called Search Match will use Appleβs internal ML algorithm to match userβs search terms to the appβs title, subtitle, and description to determine if the app is relevant to them. Itβs super simple to set up and requires no keywords. Just create it and let it run.
Note: Creative Sets arenβt a good match for the Discovery campaign since theyβre meant to be as broad as possible. The default images are likely your best bet.
As we optimize, we periodically check the keyword performance and Search Terms of the Discovery campaign to find well performing and interesting keywords that you can add to the other campaigns as exact match terms.
The steps for this are: